Who to vote for 2026
Up to 35 questions on the issues in dispute, and at the end a ranking of every list by how closely it matches your views.
- 35 questions
- 22 lists
- 6 topics
How it works
- 1
Choose what matters to you
A topic that matters more gets more questions and more weight. A topic you don’t care about is dropped from the quiz.
- 2
Answer, one question per screen
Pick the position closest to your own and go straight on to the next question. You can skip questions you have no view on.
- 3
Get a ranking of every list
A list whose position is close to yours, even if not the same, gets a partial match. Tap a list to see where you agree and where you don’t.
Good to know
- Don’t know the issue? What’s the debate? opens a short summary of it and the case for and against each position.
- More than one position works for you? Switch on Pick several, mark each one, then move on with “Next”.
- Each question can be given low, medium or high importance, so it counts for less or more in the result.
Frequently asked questions
What is “Who to Vote For”?
A free policy quiz for the elections to the 26th Knesset, with no sign-up. Answer up to 35 questions on the issues in dispute and get all 22 lists ranked by how closely they match your views, with a breakdown of where you agree with each one and where you don’t.
How were the lists’ positions worked out?
From what each list’s candidates have done and said: Knesset votes, decisions they made in government posts, platforms and public statements. The positions are an estimate, not an official statement by the parties. Where there is little to go on, the results flag the position as a “Thin record”.
Who is behind the site, and who funds it?
The site is a project by Shimon Chen: a PhD in environmental engineering, experience as a senior researcher and algorithm developer in the tech industry, and a keen interest in politics and data. It’s fully independent, with no ties to any party, organization or anyone else, and no funding from anyone. To get in touch, use “Contact us” at the bottom of the page.
Which lists are included?
22 lists. Lists that put forward fewer than ten candidates, and lists with no platform or public record to judge their positions by, are left out.
- Together, led by Naftali Bennett (רק)
- Yashar! With Eisenkot for Prime Minister, Uniting Israel (דרך)
- Amcha Yisrael (ך)
- Israel First, led by Sharren Haskel (י)
- Yisrael Beytenu, led by Avigdor Liberman (ל)
- Otzma Yehudit (ב)
- The Reservists and the Economic Party, led by Yoaz Hendel and Yaron Zelekha (די)
- The Democrats, led by Yair Golan (אמת)
- Ra’am – United Arab List (עם)
- Shas – Sephardi Torah Guardians, the movement of the late Rabbi Ovadia Yosef (שס)
- The Haredi Public, led by Moti Litner (זך)
- Eternal Covenant for the Redemption of Israel (זץ)
- Lights of Dawn – Everyone’s Party (בקר)
- Likud, with Benjamin Netanyahu for Prime Minister (מחל)
- Blue and White (כן)
- Religious Zionism, led by Bezalel Smotrich, and Zehut, led by Moshe Feiglin (ט)
- Achi Movement – the movement of the late Rabbi Yoram Abergel (צבי)
- Tzomet – House of Israel (בי)
- Tkuma Party (ק)
- The Joint List (ודם)
- United Torah Judaism – Agudat Yisrael – Degel HaTorah (ג)
- Noam for Israel (ני)
What does the quiz ask about?
35 questions on 6 topics:
- Security and the conflict: Settler violence against Palestinians · Policy toward the Palestinians · The death penalty law for terrorists
- Governance and law: Investigating the failures of October 7 · Immunity and criminal liability of elected officials · Is the Attorney General’s opinion binding? · Appointing senior civil servants · The makeup of the Judicial Selection Committee · The court’s power to strike down laws
- Sharing the burden: Service exemption for Haredi yeshiva students · National-civic service for those who don’t serve in the IDF · Benefits and priority for reservists · Counting Torah study as “making the most of earning capacity” · Core curriculum in schools · Funding kollels and Haredi men’s employment
- Religion and state: Religious content in state schools · The Law of Return: who may immigrate · Marriage and divorce in Israel · The powers of the religious courts · The kashrut monopoly · Public transport on Shabbat · Gender segregation in the public space · Appointing city rabbis
- Treatment of minorities: Crime and violence in Arab society · The Kaminitz Law and unpermitted building in Arab towns · The Nation-State Law · LGBT rights and family policy
- Economy and welfare: Price controls on staple goods · Protecting local agriculture · Contract, platform and domestic workers · Environmental regulation and local pollution · Transport investment priorities · Discounted-housing lotteries · Subsidized daycare for young children · Centralization and decentralization in the education system
How is the match worked out?
On each question, the list’s position is compared with your answer: the same position scores in full, a close one scores in part, and a distant one scores nothing. The match is the average over all the questions, each counted by its weight and by the importance you gave it and its topic. 50% is the balance point: above it, you agree with the list more than you disagree.
Are my answers stored or collected?
Your answers stay in your browser, so you can come back and pick up where you left off, and are never sent to us. A shared result carries only the ranking of the lists, not the answers behind it.
Does the quiz take into account whether a list will clear the threshold?
The ranking goes by positions alone. But next to each list, the results show in how many of the polls filed with the Central Elections Committee it clears the threshold (4 seats or more), so you can weigh that too.
Which languages is the quiz in?
Hebrew, Arabic, Russian, English and French. The questions, positions and arguments are the same in every language, and you can switch between them from the menu at the top of the page.
The lists’ positions are based on what their candidates have done and said: Knesset votes, decisions in government posts, platforms and statements. They are an estimate, not an official statement by the parties.
Spotted a mistake? Got a question or an idea?